Shawn Fagan, Diane Davis, Nick Selting, Betsy Aidem,
and David Aaron Baker. Photo by Carol Rosegg |
There are some who say the most difficult thing about
writing a play is knowing how to end it. In the case of Appropriate, which recently opened at the Westport Country
Playhouse, the problems also encompass how to start the play. So what we have
is some head scratching during the first moments of the play, followed by some
truly engaging theater and some fine acting, until we get to the closing
moments when, once again, the dandruff starts to fall as you scratch away and
say, “Well, okay…so what?”
Deftly directed by David Kennedy (save for the opening and
closing moments – and it’s up for grabs as to who is responsible for these
moments), this excursion into family history written by Branden Jacobs-Jenkins
is tinged with just a touch of gothic overtones and includes some skeletons in
the closet (or photo album or graveyard – take your pick) as a somewhat
dysfunctional family (is there any other kind?) gathers at the decrepit family
mansion to prepare it to be sold and its contents auctioned off.
The pater familias
has recently died, leaving the mansion, a decrepit hulk bulging with junk (the
whole scene nicely created by scenic designer Andrew Boyce) weighed down by
debt. The family gathers to deal with what has been left behind: embittered
sister, Toni (a gripping Betsy Aidem), a brother, Bo (David Aaron Baker), a
corporate executive worried about downsizing, and the black-sheep brother,
Franz (aka Frank – Shawn Fagan). In tow are various children and significant
others: there’s Toni’s recalcitrant son Rhys (Nick Selting), Bo’s wife, Rachel
(Diane Davis) and their two children, Ainsley (Christian Michael Camporin) and
Cassie (Allison Winn), and finally River (an engaging Anna Crivelli), Franz’s
earth-mother girl friend.
Once the clan is gathered there is initial friction dealing
with who actually gave up the most in caring for dear old Dad in his declining
years, but the arguments soon escalate with the discovery of a photo album that
apparently contains pictures of lynchings. Was Dad a racist? Rachel reveals a
telephone conversation she overheard, with her father-in-law referring to her
as the “Jew wife.” Was Dad an anti-Semite?
There’s more kindling thrown on the fire to bring the pot to
a boil, mainly dealing with Franz’s addictions and child molestation (I told
you the family was dysfunctional). Denials, accusations and recriminations
tumble over each other in crisp, acerbic dialogue that Kennedy allows to be
bitten into by the actors, giving the confrontations a realistic rhythm – after
all, when you’re arguing do you really let the other person finish what they
have to say before attacking?
A nice touch of irony is added by Jacobs-Jenkins when the
bickering family learns that the lynching photographs may have significant
historical (or collectors) value. In other words, they can make a lot of money
off pictures of black men who have been lynched. This leads to a battle-royal
(deftly set up by fight director Michael Rossmy) that is ended in a dramatic
appearance that drew appreciative gasps from the opening night audience.
Sometimes (cliché warning!), a picture is worth a thousand words (of dialogue),
and in this case it might just have made a provocative ending to the play.
The major questions about Dad are left for the audience to
decide, but there’s no doubt that this family has, by the final curtain, been
deconstructed. There are moments over the course of the two-plus hours that are
painful, others that are revelatory, and the actors allow their characters to
dig, slice and dice each other with abandon.
So, the problems with the opening and closing moments? Well,
there’s an operative audio metaphor that is established when the lights first go
down: it’s the irritating rasping (desperate mating calls) of cicadas. We, the
audience, hear them, and get the message, but the lights don’t go up. The
cicadas continue to rasp and twitter – the volume rises and falls and then
rises again, evoking some chuckles from the audience in the darkened theater.
We will again hear the offending mating calls every time there’s a scene change
(consider it a scene-in-one delivered by insects).
Okay, so a little too much chirping before the play gets
started, but what’s wrong with the final moments? More cicadas going berserk?
No. It’s now the moment for Boyce, as well as lighting designer Matthew
Richards, sound designer Fitz Patton and props master Alison Mantilla to take
center stage for a series of quick vignettes that depict the physical
dissolution of the mansion (of the family??) The effects are impressive, but
they seem extremely beside the point – it’s a series of, well, okay, here’s
what we can do with the set – like that? (blackout) – this is also what we can
do (blackout) – okay, we can also do this. Has the destruction been caused by
ghosts or Mother Nature? Your guess is as good as mine.
In the final moments of dialogue the actors have deftly
established disruption, dissolution and, in the end, despair. What follows
visually is simply overkill.
Appropriate,
though it runs a bit long, is often gripping, intense theater marred by
production values that call too much attention to themselves. The show runs
through September 2. For tickets or more information call 203-227-4177 or go to
www.westportplayhouse.org
No comments:
Post a Comment